Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a job worker is entitled to CENVAT credit on imported inputs covered by Bills of Entry standing in the name of the principal manufacturer, where the goods were received and used by the job worker and the principal manufacturer had issued a declaration authorising such credit.
Analysis: The only objection was that the Bills of Entry did not bear the job worker's name. The relevant rule prescribed the documents on which credit could be taken, but did not require that the person availing credit must necessarily be named in the document. The record showed that the inputs were received, duty-paid character of the documents was not disputed, the inputs were used in manufacture, and the principal manufacturer had issued a declaration that the goods would be sent directly to the job worker and that credit would be taken by the job worker. On these facts, the documentary requirement was held to be satisfied and the earlier decisions recognising credit in similar circumstances were followed.
Conclusion: The job worker was entitled to CENVAT credit; denial of credit solely because the Bills of Entry named the principal manufacturer was not justified.