Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (11) TMI 34 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds assessment order under Income Tax Act, allows deduction for eligible projects The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act was not erroneous or prejudicial to ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal upholds assessment order under Income Tax Act, allows deduction for eligible projects

                          The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. Regarding the eligibility of the assessee's projects for deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Act, the Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries and verifications during the assessment proceedings. Relying on relevant case law, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax passed under section 263 of the Act.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.
                          2. Eligibility of the assessee's projects for deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Erroneous and Prejudicial Assessment Order:
                          The primary issue raised by the assessee is that the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Ld. CIT) erred in holding that the assessment order passed by the AO under section 143(3) of the Act is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. The Ld. CIT invoked section 263 of the Act, setting aside the assessment order on the grounds that the AO did not conduct proper inquiries and verification during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal noted that the AO had issued a notice under section 142(1) of the Act, requiring the assessee to furnish details about the deduction claimed under section 80IB(10). The assessee responded with the necessary documents, including the tax audit report in form 3CD and other relevant details. The Tribunal found that the AO had indeed conducted due verification and inquiries, and thus, the assessment order could not be held as erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.

                          2. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80IB(10):
                          The second issue pertains to the eligibility of the assessee's projects for deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Act. The Ld. CIT identified defects in the deduction claimed by the assessee for two projects: Parshwanath Metro City (PMC) and Parshwanath Om Residency (POR).

                          a. PMC Project:
                          The Ld. CIT observed that the Building Use (BU) permission was granted for only 349 units, whereas the project was initially approved for 396 units, later revised to 376 units. The Ld. CIT concluded that the project was not completed by the stipulated date (31st March 2012) as per the provisions of the Act. The assessee contended that it was eligible for deduction for the completed units and provided details of the units sold and unsold. The Tribunal noted that the AO had accepted the assessee's claim based on the auditor's certificate and other supporting documents.

                          b. POR Project:
                          The Ld. CIT noted that the permission for the development of the POR project was granted on 27th October 2010, which should have been obtained before 30th March 2007. The assessee argued that the date of application for permission (28th March 2007) should be considered relevant for claiming the deduction. The Tribunal found that the AO had verified the necessary details during the assessment proceedings and accepted the assessee's claim.

                          Tribunal's Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal held that the AO had conducted proper inquiries and verification during the assessment proceedings. It relied on the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Malabar Industrial Co Ltd Vs. CIT and the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in CIT vs. Arvind Jewellers, which emphasize that section 263 cannot be invoked merely because the Commissioner disagrees with the AO's conclusion if the AO has conducted due inquiries. The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Ld. CIT under section 263 of the Act, allowing the appeal of the assessee.

                          Final Order:
                          The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order of the Ld. CIT was quashed. The Tribunal pronounced the order on 25/10/2019 at Ahmedabad.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found