ITAT Ahmedabad: Partial win on expenses appeal for diesel and oil purchases, disallowance restricted, JP Stone Crusher purchases allowed

The ITAT Ahmedabad partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of expenses for diesel and oil purchases from Ashapura Petroleum and purchases made from JP Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. The disallowance for diesel and oil purchases was restricted to Rs. 1,13,371 due to incomplete documentation, despite confirming the project nature and payment method. For purchases from JP Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd., the ITAT disagreed with the CIT (A) and directed the AO to delete the disallowance, considering the business course transactions and payment evidence.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of expenses for purchase of diesel and oil from Ashapura Petroleum.
2. Disallowance of purchases made from JP Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd.

Issue 1: Disallowance of expenses for purchase of diesel and oil from Ashapura Petroleum:
The appellant contested the disallowance of Rs. 5,47,863 for diesel and oil purchases from Ashapura Petroleum. The AO treated the expenses as bogus due to lack of supporting evidence. The appellant submitted additional evidence, including account confirmation, bills, and contra confirmation. The AO noted issues with bills, lack of original bills, and overwriting. The appellant explained the expenses were for the "LAKHTAR project" and were directly related to construction activities. The AO accepted confirmation from Ashapura Petroleum during remand proceedings. The CIT (A) upheld the disallowance, citing lack of evidence to refute AO's concerns. The ITAT noted the project nature, payment method, and subsequent year's purchases. They allowed relief but restricted disallowance to Rs. 1,13,371 due to incomplete documentation and in-house consumption.

Issue 2: Disallowance of purchases made from JP Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd.:
The appellant challenged the disallowance of Rs. 2,01,054 out of total purchases of Rs. 22,60,400 from JP Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. The AO treated the expenses as bogus, as there was no response to the notice under section 133(6). The CIT (A) reduced the disallowance based on a remand report showing corresponding sales by JP Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. The ITAT noted undisputed facts: payment through cheque, liability shown by JP Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd., and business course transactions. They held that the amount was eligible for deduction under business expenses, disagreeing with the CIT (A) and directing the AO to delete the addition. The ITAT allowed the appeal partially.

In conclusion, the ITAT Ahmedabad partially allowed the appeal, providing detailed analysis and reasoning for each issue raised by the assessee.

---