Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Decision on Tax Treatment of Land Sale Profit & Deductions

        M/s. Tajmahal Agro Industries (P) Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Company Circle III (1), Chennai. And M/s. Tajmahal Agro Industries (P) Ltd. Versus The ACIT, Company Circle III (1), Chennai. And (Vice-Versa)

        M/s. Tajmahal Agro Industries (P) Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer, Company Circle III (1), Chennai. And M/s. Tajmahal Agro Industries (P) Ltd. Versus ... Issues Involved:

        1. Treatment of profit on sale of land as short-term capital gain.
        2. Disallowance of deduction under Section 80G.
        3. Taxability of lease rent received from leasing out the machinery and building shed.
        4. Rejection of books of account and disallowance of expenses incurred for sale of by-products.
        5. Estimation of processing charges and disallowance of various expenditures.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Treatment of Profit on Sale of Land as Short-Term Capital Gain:

        The assessee sold a rice mill as a composite sale and credited Rs. 95,61,762 towards goodwill without obtaining any money. The AO treated the profit from the transfer as short-term capital gains due to depreciation claimed in earlier years. The assessee argued that the AO did not assign any value to the cost of land and adopted the entire market value as short-term capital gain. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that no bifurcation of the asset was provided, and depreciation had been claimed on the entire amount, making the value of land "Nil." The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s findings and dismissed the corresponding grounds of the appeal.

        2. Disallowance of Deduction Under Section 80G:

        The assessee produced donation receipts eligible for deduction under Section 80G during assessment proceedings. The AO refused the claim as it was not made in the return. The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider the claim and allow the relief if found meritorious, treating the corresponding grounds of the assessee as allowed.

        3. Taxability of Lease Rent Received from Leasing Out the Machinery and Building Shed:

        The assessee leased out its plant and machinery and claimed various expenditures against the lease income. The AO treated the lease rental as "Income from Other Sources," estimating the lease rental income at Rs. 22,72,000. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, stating that the assessee had not carried out any business activity and was only letting out assets. The Tribunal found these findings justified and dismissed the corresponding grounds of the assessee's appeal.

        4. Rejection of Books of Account and Disallowance of Expenses Incurred for Sale of By-Products:

        The AO rejected the books of account due to the absence of proper stock records and estimated the income from the sale of by-products. The assessee claimed various expenditures, which the AO disallowed, treating the entire sale proceeds as income. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow 30% of the sale proceeds as reasonable expenditure, determining the income from this source at Rs. 47,66,301.

        5. Estimation of Processing Charges and Disallowance of Various Expenditures:

        For the assessment year 2007-08, the AO estimated processing charges based on previous year's rates and disallowed various expenditures claimed by the assessee. The CIT(A) deleted the addition towards processing charges but upheld other disallowances. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision on disallowances but directed the AO to allow reasonable expenditure for earning the processing charges, subject to relief for the assessee.

        Revenue's Appeal:

        The Revenue appealed against the deletion of medical expenses and addition towards processing charges. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on medical expenses but upheld the addition towards processing charges, allowing reasonable expenditure for earning the income.

        Conclusion:

        The assessee's appeals for the assessment years 2004-05 and 2006-07 were partly allowed, and the appeal for the assessment year 2007-08 was dismissed. The Revenue's appeal for the assessment year 2007-08 was partly allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found