Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal recalls order on Income Tax Act deduction, grants fresh hearing after recent Supreme Court judgment.</h1> <h3>Shri Subhash Chand Versus The ACIT, Circle 5 (1), Chandigarh</h3> The Tribunal recalled its order dated 27.11.2018 regarding the deduction u/s 80IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on the recent Supreme Court judgment ... Rectification of mistake - allowance of deduction u/s 80IC on substantial expansion undertaken by the assessee - HELD THAT:- The issue in the impugned appeal is covered by the decision of in the case of ‘Pr.CIT, Shimla vs. M/s Aarham Softronics’ [2019 (2) TMI 1285 - SUPREME COURT] wherein, it has been held that even a new undertaking which has claimed deduction of its eligible profits @ 100% thereof for the first five years is entitled to claim deduction @ 100% of its profits thereafter on account of substantial expansion undertaken by it. Since the decision of the Apex court in Classic Binding [2018 (8) TMI 1209 - SUPREME COURT] stands overruled, this in itself constitutes a mistake apparent from record. A binding decision is always retrospective and the decision overruled was never the law of the land. When a court decides a matter it only interprets law and applies it to the facts of the case. If the interpretation of law is found to be contrary in the light of judicial pronouncement rendered subsequently, it discloses a mistake apparent from record. Hence, a mistake apparent on record has occurred in the order [ 2018 (12) TMI 193 - ITAT CHANDIGARH] of this Tribunal. Hence, this is a fit case for recalling the said common order and for fresh hearing, which we hereby do. Issues:1. Recalling of the order dated 27.11.2018 by the Tribunal based on a recent judgment of the Supreme Court regarding deduction u/s 80IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Detailed Analysis:The Misc. Application dated 22.03.2019 was filed by the assessee seeking the recall of the Tribunal's order dated 27.11.2018 related to the allowance of deduction u/s 80IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The issue revolved around the eligibility of the assessee for a deduction of 100% of the eligible profits due to substantial expansion. The Tribunal had earlier allowed the Revenue's appeal based on a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of 'CIT Vs. M/s Classic Binding Industries'. However, the recent judgment in the case of 'Pr CIT Vs. Aarham Softronics' by the Supreme Court reversed the earlier decision in 'Classic Binding Industries', leading to a plea for the recall of the order dated 27.11.2018.The Ld. Counsel for the assessee argued that the recent Supreme Court judgment in 'Pr CIT Vs. Aarham Softronics' had overruled the decision in 'Classic Binding Industries', making it a mistake apparent from the record in the Tribunal's order dated 27.11.2018. The Ld. DR did not contest this assertion. The Tribunal, after considering the arguments and the recent legal developments, concluded that a mistake apparent on the record had indeed occurred in the earlier order. The Tribunal held that a binding decision is always retrospective, and the decision overruled was never the law of the land, indicating a clear mistake in the previous order. Therefore, the Tribunal found it a fit case for recalling the order and conducting a fresh hearing.Consequently, the Tribunal recalled the order dated 27.11.2018, restored the appeal, and scheduled a fresh hearing for 06.08.2019 based on the recent legal developments and the mistake apparent from the record. The Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the Open Court on 06.08.2019.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found