Tribunal emphasizes fair process and evidence consideration in appeal decisions.

The Tribunal acknowledged the lack of proper opportunity for the appellant to reply to the show cause notice and directed all issues to be remanded to the CIT(A) for a decision on merit. Despite the appellant's non-appearance leading to dismissal, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of proper representation. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the CIT(A)'s failure to consider additional evidence, leading to a remand for a fair consideration. The judgment underscores the significance of upholding natural justice principles and ensuring all relevant evidence is considered in legal proceedings.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Proper opportunity to reply the show cause notice not given by Assessing Officer
2. Dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) due to non-appearance of appellant
3. Consideration of additional evidences by CIT(A) before arriving at findings

Analysis:
1. The appellant raised concerns regarding the lack of proper opportunity to reply to the show cause notice issued by the Assessing Officer. The Assessment Order was passed without giving the appellant a fair chance to respond adequately. The appellant highlighted this issue before the CIT(A), emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles being upheld during the assessment process. The Tribunal acknowledged this lapse and directed that all issues be remanded back to the file of the CIT(A) for a decision on merit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the appellant to be given a proper opportunity of hearing in line with principles of natural justice.

2. The appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the appellant despite notice. The Tribunal noted this and considered the submissions made by the appellant before the CIT(A) as submissions before them. The lack of representation by the appellant was a significant factor in the dismissal of the appeal by the CIT(A). However, the Tribunal decided to take into account the appellant's submissions and granted a partial allowance of the appeal for statistical purposes, highlighting the importance of proper representation during legal proceedings.

3. The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) did not consider the additional evidences filed by the appellant before arriving at the findings. The failure to consider these evidences raised concerns about the completeness of the decision-making process. As a result, the Tribunal decided to remand all the issues back to the file of the CIT(A) for a decision on merit. The appellant was directed to cooperate and attend the appellate proceedings to ensure a fair consideration of the additional evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering all relevant evidences before making a final decision on the appeal.

This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues raised by the appellant and the Tribunal's decision to address these issues by remanding the case back to the CIT(A) for a decision on merit while ensuring the principles of natural justice are upheld.

---