Tribunal adjusts income additions, upholds unrecorded loan addition despite partial disclosure.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of an addition of Rs. 8.00 lakh in the assessee's hands related to loans issued by M/s. Govind Ram & Sons, as it was revealed that the loan was given by another individual. However, additions totaling Rs. 1.08 crore from other sources were sustained after allowing for telescoping benefits. The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 41.00 lakh from unrecorded loans given by another individual, despite partial disclosure of income. The decision was pronounced on 4th October 2019.

---

---

Issues:
Confirmation of addition based on cash loans advanced outside books of account.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was against the addition of cash loans advanced outside the books of account found during a search and seizure action. The documents forming the basis of the addition were loan receipts/cheques issued by certain parties found at the assessee's premises.

2. The first issue involved cheques totaling Rs. 22.00 lakh issued by M/s. Govind Ram & Sons. The AO found discrepancies in the loan details, leading to an addition of Rs. 8.00 lakh in the assessee's hands. However, it was revealed that the loan was given by another individual, Mr. Mohinder T. Kalani. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the Rs. 8.00 lakh addition in the assessee's hands and suggested examination in Mr. Mohinder T. Kalani's hands.

3. The second issue concerned cheques amounting to Rs. 1.08 crore issued by M/s. Karda Construction. The assessee failed to correlate these cheques with recorded loan transactions, leading to an addition. The Tribunal sustained an addition of Rs. 85,93,250 after allowing the benefit of telescoping.

4. Another addition was made based on cheques issued by Mr. Manohar B. Sadhwani and Mr. Baldeva, totaling Rs. 15.00 lakh. The assessee did not provide explanations for these amounts, resulting in the sustained additions.

5. The last addition was on account of unrecorded loans given by Mr. Pradip D. Kalani, amounting to Rs. 41.00 lakh. The Tribunal upheld this addition as there was direct evidence of the advancing of cash loans by the assessee. Despite Mr. Pradip D. Kalani offering Rs. 5.00 lakh as his income, the Tribunal held that the undisclosed income should be taxed in the assessee's hands.

6. In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the additions made based on the cash loans advanced outside the books of account. The decision was pronounced on 4th October 2019.

---