Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (10) TMI 247 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds tax authority's decision on FCNR-B interest, orders reassessment. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals, affirming the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's order under Section 263. The Tribunal held that the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal upholds tax authority's decision on FCNR-B interest, orders reassessment.

                            The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals, affirming the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's order under Section 263. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer's failure to adequately verify the taxability of interest on FCNR-B deposits rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reassess the interest income independently and determine the appropriate tax liability.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Legality of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's (PCIT) order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Whether the Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment without proper verification and application of mind.
                            3. The taxability of interest on FCNR-B deposits held by the appellant's daughter.
                            4. Jurisdiction of the PCIT to revise an issue already considered by the Commissioner (Appeals).
                            5. The authority of the PCIT to direct the AO to complete the assessment in a specific manner.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Legality of the PCIT's Order under Section 263:
                            The appeals by the assessee challenge the order of the PCIT, Trivandrum, dated 11/12/2018, passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2010-11. The PCIT invoked Section 263, contending that the AO's assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, as it failed to properly assess the taxability of interest on FCNR-B deposits.

                            2. Verification and Application of Mind by the AO:
                            The PCIT concluded that the AO completed the assessment without adequate verification and application of mind. The AO had accepted the assessee's claim regarding the non-taxability of interest on FCNR-B deposits based on a statement from the State Bank of India. However, the PCIT noted that the AO did not sufficiently investigate the applicability of FEMA regulations, which prohibit joint FCNR-B accounts between residents and non-residents.

                            3. Taxability of Interest on FCNR-B Deposits:
                            The core issue was whether the interest on FCNR-B deposits held by the appellant's daughter was taxable in the appellant's hands. The PCIT observed that, according to FEMA regulations, when one joint account holder becomes a resident, the account should either be redesignated as a resident account or the resident's name should be deleted. Since these actions were not taken, the PCIT argued that the interest should be taxed in the appellant's hands. The PCIT also noted that the relevant RBI notification allowing joint accounts between residents and non-residents was not applicable retrospectively for the periods in question.

                            4. Jurisdiction of the PCIT to Revise an Issue Already Considered by the Commissioner (Appeals):
                            The assessee contended that the issue of taxability of interest on FCNR-B deposits had already been considered by the Commissioner (Appeals) and thus, the PCIT had no jurisdiction to revise this issue under Section 263. The PCIT, however, argued that the AO's order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue, as it did not adequately address the taxability of the interest income.

                            5. Authority of the PCIT to Direct the AO:
                            The PCIT directed the AO to verify, re-quantify, and tax the interest amounts accrued, which were wrongly not taxed in the earlier assessment order. The PCIT relied on various judicial precedents to assert that the AO should have made further inquiries before accepting the assessee's claims. The Tribunal upheld the PCIT's direction, emphasizing that the AO must conduct a thorough investigation and act judiciously to protect the revenue's interests.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals, affirming the PCIT's order under Section 263. It held that the AO's failure to adequately verify the taxability of interest on FCNR-B deposits rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue. The Tribunal directed the AO to reassess the interest income independently, without being influenced by the PCIT's directions, and to determine the appropriate tax liability.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found