Tribunal Admits Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Application

The Tribunal admitted the application to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional, and a moratorium was declared. The Operational Creditor was directed to deposit funds with the IRP for expenses. The IRP was mandated to carry out all functions under the Code, with all Corporate Debtor personnel required to assist. The application was admitted under Section 9(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, with orders to be communicated to relevant parties and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)
2. Outstanding debt and default by the Corporate Debtor
3. Validity of invoices and payments made to a third party
4. Compliance with the procedural requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP):
The application was filed under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC 2016) read with Rule 6 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 by the Applicant, Tricolite Electrical Industries Limited, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency process against HBN Homes Colonisers Private Limited (Corporate Debtor).

2. Outstanding Debt and Default by the Corporate Debtor:
The Applicant raised various invoices amounting to Rs. 3,21,24,511/- against the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor paid Rs. 2,62,96,033/-, leaving an outstanding amount of Rs. 58,28,478/- along with interest of Rs. 36,73,378/- @18% as on 30.09.2017, totaling Rs. 95,01,856/-. The Applicant issued a demand notice under section 8 of IBC, 2016, which was served through speed post. No notice of dispute was raised by the Corporate Debtor, nor was the money paid.

3. Validity of Invoices and Payments Made to a Third Party:
The Corporate Debtor raised objections, claiming that four invoices were never delivered and that the amount of Rs. 34,60,240/- was transferred to Mitelite Electric Company, a sister concern of the Applicant, on behalf of the Corporate Debtor. The Applicant countered by providing evidence that the invoices were received by the Corporate Debtor and that the transfer to Mitelite Electric Company was mutually agreed upon. The Tribunal found the Applicant's contentions plausible and the Corporate Debtor's objections unsupported by evidence.

4. Compliance with Procedural Requirements under IBC, 2016:
The Tribunal examined the application under sub-section 5(i) of section 9 of the IBC, ensuring it was complete, the unpaid operational debt was not repaid, the notice for payment was delivered, no notice of dispute was received, and no disciplinary proceedings were pending against the proposed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The Tribunal was satisfied that the application met all the requirements of section 9 of the Code.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal admitted the application, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and a moratorium was declared in terms of Section 14 of the Code. The Tribunal directed the Operational Creditor to deposit Rs. 2 lakhs with the IRP for expenses. The IRP was tasked with performing all functions as per the Code, and all personnel connected with the Corporate Debtor were legally obligated to assist the IRP. The application was admitted under Section 9(5) of IBC, 2016, and copies of the order were to be communicated to the Applicant, Corporate Debtor, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).

---