TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Grants 90-Day Extension for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process</h1> <h3>Worxpace Consulting Pvt. Ltd. Versus IreoFiveriver Pvt. Ltd.</h3> Worxpace Consulting Pvt. Ltd. Versus IreoFiveriver Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Extension/Exclusion of time for running Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.2. Compliance with Section 12(2) of the Code and approval by the Committee of Creditors (CoC).3. Consideration of exclusion of time for collating requisite record/information.4. Granting extension of the statutory period for conducting the CIRP.5. Examination of the need for exclusion of time beyond the granted extension.Issue 1: Extension/Exclusion of Time for CIRP:The Resolution Professional (RP) filed an application seeking extension/exclusion of time for running CIRP due to various delays and challenges faced during the process. The RP requested an extension of 90 days beyond the initial 180 days. The CoC approved the extension with a voting share of 79.2%. The Tribunal considered the RP's application, the minutes of the CoC meetings, and the necessity of the extension. The Tribunal extended the period of CIRP by a further 90 days from the expiry of the initial 180 days.Issue 2: Compliance with Section 12(2) of the Code:The RP's application under Section 12(2) of the Code was filed with the CoC's instructions by a vote of more than 66% of the voting share, meeting the conditions set out in the Code. The Tribunal examined the minutes of the CoC meeting and found that the Information Memorandum was prepared, and Expression of Interest (EOI) was proposed to be issued, necessitating the extension of the CIRP duration beyond 180 days. The Tribunal concluded that the CIRP could not be completed within 180 days and hence extended it by a further 90 days.Issue 3: Consideration of Exclusion of Time for Record/Information Collation:The RP sought exclusion of 120 days for time lost in collating necessary record/information during the CIRP process. The Tribunal acknowledged the challenges faced by the RP in obtaining information and preparing the Information Memorandum. However, the Tribunal did not grant the exclusion at that moment, instructing the RP to focus on completing the CIRP within the extended time. If completion becomes impossible due to uncontrollable circumstances, the RP can file for exclusion later for consideration.Issue 4: Granting Extension of Statutory Period for CIRP:The Tribunal noted the delays and challenges faced during the CIRP, including the delayed appointment of the RP and the lack of required information. Despite these hurdles, the RP progressed with preparing the Information Memorandum and planned to issue the EOI. The CoC approved the resolution for the RP to apply for extension, leading to the Tribunal granting a 90-day extension for the CIRP to be completed effectively.Issue 5: Examination of Exclusion of Time Beyond Granted Extension:The RP also requested exclusion of time, citing a previous judgment where exclusion was allowed. However, the Tribunal, having already granted a 90-day extension, deemed the exclusion request premature. The Tribunal advised the RP to focus on completing the CIRP within the extended period. If circumstances beyond the RP's control hinder completion, an exclusion application can be filed later for consideration based on merits.In conclusion, the Tribunal granted the extension of the CIRP period by 90 days, emphasizing the need for the RP to diligently work towards completing the process within the extended timeframe and addressing any challenges promptly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
