TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Exclusion of Unrelated Charges from Assessable Value Upheld by CESTAT</h1> <h3>EASTMAN CRUSHER COMPANY (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HALDIA</h3> EASTMAN CRUSHER COMPANY (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HALDIA - 2008 (224) E.L.T. 86 (Tri. - Kolkata) The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled that designing charges not related to excisable goods cannot be included in the assessable value. The decision was based on the case law of Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. Statfield Systems (Coating) Pvt. Ltd. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The lower appellate authority's order was criticized for not addressing the issue effectively.
TaxTMI 