1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court orders release of Truck No. KA-14-B-6847 & goods after payment of tax difference</h1> The Gujarat HC ordered the respondents to release Truck No. KA-14-B-6847 and its goods to the petitioner after payment of the tax and penalty difference, ... Release of seized goods along with the truck - petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already paid the amount of tax and penalty as computed by them - HELD THAT:- By way of interim relief, the respondents are directed to release the Truck No. KA-14-B-6847 along with the goods contained therein subject to the petitioner paying the differential amount of tax and penalty between the amount paid by the petitioner and the amount computed by the respondents under section 129 of the Central/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Gujarat High Court directed the respondents to release Truck No. KA-14-B-6847 and its goods to the petitioner upon payment of the differential amount of tax and penalty. The petitioner had already paid the computed amount. The order was given by Justice Harsha Devani.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
