Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to retain the benefit of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 despite prior notices under the reassessment provisions and whether the authority could revoke the certificate issued under the scheme by invoking Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
Analysis: The petitioner had already been served with notice under the reassessment machinery before the scheme was invoked, and the disclosed amount had been shown in earlier returns. The scheme itself excluded income assessable for which notice under the specified provisions had been served before commencement. On the facts, the declaration under the scheme was held to have been made by suppressing the earlier disclosure and by misrepresenting the nature of the income. The power to issue the certificate was treated as carrying, in the absence of a statutory bar, the incidental power to withdraw or rescind it under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
Conclusion: The certificate under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 was validly revoked, and the petitioner was held not entitled to the scheme benefit.