Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the attachment of the writ petitioner company's bank account to recover the unpaid penalty imposed on its director under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could be continued, or whether it should be raised on payment of part of the amount and furnishing of security.
Analysis: The tax liability under the revised assessment had already been discharged, but the penalty component remained unpaid and was sought to be recovered by attaching the company's bank account. The Court noted the contention that the company is a distinct juristic entity, while also noticing the Revenue's reliance on the provision enabling attachment of money due or to become due to the dealer. Without entering into the merits of the challenge to the assessment proceedings, the Court balanced the petitioner's request for relief against the Revenue's interest by directing payment of 25% of the penalty amount, crediting the sum already recovered, and securing the balance by a personal bond.
Conclusion: The attachment was not finally sustained; it was ordered to be raised on compliance with the directed payment and bond, with automatic revival if the underlying penalty order was not challenged within the stipulated time.