Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit of service tax paid on GTA services used for outward transportation of finished goods up to the buyer's premises was admissible where the sale was on F.O.R. terms and freight formed part of the assessable value.
Analysis: The purchase orders and customer letters showed that delivery was on F.O.R. basis, the assessee bore the freight and insurance, and the goods were delivered at the customer's premises. The invoices and pricing structure indicated that freight charges were included in the assessable value on which excise duty had been paid. In these circumstances, the buyer's premises constituted the place of removal, and the restriction against credit beyond the place of removal did not apply. The reasoning adopted was consistent with the view that where freight is borne by the assessee and embedded in the assessable value, credit on outward transportation up to the buyer's premises is allowable.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the credit on GTA services up to the buyer's premises.
Final Conclusion: The disallowance of credit was unsustainable, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals succeeded with consequential reliefs.