Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal allows delay in claim submission, directs Resolution Professional to decide on admission.</h1> <h3>JBF Industries Ltd. Versus Mr. Anup Kumar Singh And Suryachakra Power Corporation Ltd. (Through the Resolution Professional)</h3> The tribunal allowed the application, condoning the delay in submitting the claim and directing the Resolution Professional to decide on the claim's ... Condonation of delay in filing claims before Resolution Professional - power of Tribunal to condone delay - Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016 - Resolution Professional rejected the claim of the Applicant only on the ground the claim was not submitted within 90 days of the insolvency commencement date - HELD THAT:- The Applicant stated reasons for non-submission of claims within time. The Applicant is not aware of submitting Form -C to the Resolution Professional. The CIRP of Corporate Debtor is still pending. The Applicant claiming that it will come under the ambit of Financial Creditor, even if the claim of the Applicant is accepted by the RP that does not affect the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Resolution Professional has not considered the claim of the Applicant simply on the ground that the claim was submitted beyond 90 days. The Resolution Professional has not decided the claim on merits whether the claim is to be admitted or to be rejected. The Resolution Professional has not gone into this question because he considered that the claim filed by the Applicant was beyond 90 day from the date of admission of the Petition it is an undisputed fac Applicant submitted claim beyond 90 days. However, Regulation 12(2) of IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons Regulations, 2016 provides that claims by creditors to be filed within 90 days from the date of commencement of insolvency. This Application is filed seeking condonation of delay in submitting the claim before the Resolution Professional. I am satisfied with the reasons given for the delay. The CIRP is pending. Therefore, delay can be condoned but it is for the Resolution Professional to decide whether claim to be admitted or not - The delay in submitting the claim by Applicant/creditor is condoned and Resolution Professional to decide accordingly to law whether the claim submitted by the Applicant to be admitted or not. Application allowed. Issues:Delay in filing claim before Resolution Professional under Section 60(5) of the Code read with Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016.Analysis:The Applicant sought condonation of delay in filing claims before the Resolution Professional under Section 60(5) of the Code read with Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016. The Applicant had filed two Proofs of Claim in Form-C on February 4, 2019, within 124 days of the Insolvency Commencement Date. However, the Resolution Professional rejected the claims on the grounds that they were submitted beyond the 90-day limit specified in Regulation 12 of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. The Resolution Professional cited Regulation 12(2) which mandates creditors to submit claims within 90 days of the insolvency commencement date.The key question before the tribunal was whether the delay in filing the claims could be condoned. The Applicant argued that the tribunal had the power to condone the delay under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016, and contended that the timeline prescribed under Regulation 12 was directory, not mandatory. The Applicant relied on a Supreme Court judgment to support this argument, emphasizing that certain timelines under the IBC were considered directory, not mandatory.The tribunal considered the circumstances leading to the delay in filing the claims. It noted that the Applicant's delay was due to a lack of knowledge about submitting claims in Form-C to the Resolution Professional until informed via email on December 29, 2018. The tribunal found that the Applicant had valid reasons for the delay and that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was still ongoing. It concluded that the delay could be condoned, leaving the Resolution Professional to decide on the admission of the claims based on merit.In the final decision, the tribunal allowed the application, condoning the delay in submitting the claim and directing the Resolution Professional to decide on the claim's admission according to the law. The tribunal emphasized that condoning the delay would not impact the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, ensuring justice and due process in the proceedings.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found