Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dispute between the parties ought to be referred to arbitration and a sole arbitrator appointed in terms of the MoU.
Analysis: The MoU contained an arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or relating to the contract. The parties jointly requested appointment of a named retired Judge as sole arbitrator, and the appointment was made subject to the requisite declaration of independence and impartiality under Section 12 and the fee structure under the Fourth Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The seat of arbitration was fixed at Aurangabad in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Outcome: The dispute was referred to arbitration and a sole arbitrator was appointed.