Tribunal upholds original statements, reduces penalties under Customs Act sections. Confiscation of gold bars upheld.

The Tribunal upheld the original statements and Mahazar proceedings, concluding the appellants confessed their guilt. The show-cause notice dispatch within six months was deemed compliant with the Customs Act. The penalty under Section 112(a) was reduced to Rs. 1 lakh for each appellant, and the penalty under Section 114AA was set aside. The appeals were partly allowed, with the confiscation of gold bars upheld.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the retracted statements.
2. Compliance with the six-month notice period under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act.
3. Appropriateness of penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the retracted statements:
The appellants argued that their statements recorded on 15/10/2015 were retracted via sworn affidavits on 27/10/2015, claiming they were unaware of the document contents when signing. They contended that retracted statements require corroboration by independent evidence, citing multiple judicial precedents. However, the Tribunal found that the affidavits were not presented before the lower authorities and that subsequent statements on 07/01/2016 did not reference the retraction. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the original statements and the Mahazar proceedings, concluding that the appellants had confessed their guilt.

2. Compliance with the six-month notice period under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act:
The appellants claimed the show-cause notice was received beyond the six-month period from the date of seizure, making the confiscation void. They argued that the notice must be "given" within six months, meaning actually received. The Tribunal, however, referred to the jurisdictional High Courts of Karnataka and Kerala, which held that dispatching the notice by registered post within the six-month period constitutes compliance. The Tribunal noted that the notice was dispatched within the stipulated period, thus adhering to the requirements of Section 110(2) read with Section 153 of the Customs Act.

3. Appropriateness of penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act:
The Tribunal found the penalty of Rs. 8 lakhs under Section 112(a) to be excessive and reduced it to Rs. 1 lakh for each appellant. Regarding the penalty under Section 114AA, the Tribunal determined that the appellants did not intentionally make false declarations or statements. Therefore, the penalty under Section 114AA was set aside.

Conclusion:
The appeals were partly allowed. The confiscation of the gold bars was upheld. The penalty under Section 112(a) was reduced to Rs. 1 lakh for each appellant, and the penalty under Section 114AA was dropped.

---