Foreign legal services and mineral oil-linked maintenance receipts were excluded from FTS and taxed under section 44BB.

Legal representation before foreign courts did not constitute fees for technical services or fees for included services because the work did not make available technical knowledge, skill or experience for future independent use; the receipts were therefore outside section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Maintenance services for a high-resolution CT scanner used in oil-related research were directly and inextricably connected with prospecting and production of mineral oil, so the receipts fell within the presumptive regime under section 44BB and not as fees for technical services. The additions treating both receipts as taxable fees for technical services were set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether receipts for legal representation before foreign courts were taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services. (ii) Whether receipts for maintenance of a high-resolution CT scanner used in oil-related research were taxable as fees for technical services or fell under the presumptive regime applicable to mineral oil activities.

Issue (i): Whether receipts for legal representation before foreign courts were taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services.

Analysis: The legal services were rendered in connection with litigation before a foreign court and did not make available any technical knowledge, skill or experience to the assessee for future independent use. Professional legal representation before a foreign forum was also treated as falling outside the domestic concept of fees for technical services.

Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services and were held to be outside section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue (ii): Whether receipts for maintenance of a high-resolution CT scanner used in oil-related research were taxable as fees for technical services or fell under the presumptive regime applicable to mineral oil activities.

Analysis: The maintenance services were found to be directly associated and inextricably connected with prospecting and production of mineral oil. Such receipts were therefore regarded as consideration for a mining or like project and not as fees for technical services.

Conclusion: The receipts were held to be taxable under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and not as fees for technical services.

Final Conclusion: Both appeals succeeded and the additions treating the receipts as taxable fees for technical services were set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Services directly and inextricably connected with prospecting, extraction or production of mineral oil fall within section 44BB and are excluded from fees for technical services, while foreign legal representation that does not make available technical knowledge or skill is not taxable as fees for included services under the treaty.

---