Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were vitiated for denial of personal hearing and violation of natural justice.
Analysis: The assessment was made under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, whose proviso bars passing an order under sub-sections (1) and (2) without giving the dealer a reasonable opportunity to show cause. The corresponding earlier provision under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was treated as in pari materia. Since a specific request for personal hearing had been made and not granted, the assessment orders were held to have been passed in breach of the statutory requirement and natural justice.
Conclusion: The denial of personal hearing vitiated the assessment orders, which were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after affording personal hearing.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions succeeded on the limited ground of violation of natural justice, with the assessments quashed and the authority directed to proceed afresh after hearing the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute mandates a reasonable opportunity to show cause and a specific request for personal hearing is made in assessment proceedings, refusal of such hearing invalidates the resulting assessment order.