Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        NCLT Admits Insolvency Application, Parties Reach Settlement, Corporate Debtor Management Restored

        Shyam Kumar Garg Versus Sunrise 14-A/S Demnark & Anr.

        Shyam Kumar Garg Versus Sunrise 14-A/S Demnark & Anr. - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Admittance of Insolvency Application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
        2. Settlement Agreement between the parties.
        3. Expenses and fees of the Interim Resolution Professional.
        4. Withdrawal of Insolvency Application and restoration of the Corporate Debtor’s management.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Admittance of Insolvency Application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
        Sunrise 14 A/S Denmark, the Financial Creditor, filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Metalore Overseas Pvt. Ltd., the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, admitted the application on 13th May 2019, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

        2. Settlement Agreement between the parties:
        During the appeal, the parties reached a settlement. A formal Settlement Agreement dated 4th June 2019 was executed between Maersk Trade Finance A/S (MTF) and the Metalore Promoters. The agreement acknowledged an outstanding amount of USD 222,722, but MTF agreed to accept a Settlement Amount of USD 150,000 in full and final settlement of all dues. The terms included the transfer of the Settlement Amount to an account designated by MTF and compliance with all terms and conditions of the agreement by both parties.

        3. Expenses and fees of the Interim Resolution Professional:
        Mr. Anil Bhatia, the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), reported expenses of Rs. 1,65,000 towards advertisement and litigation and sought fees for 30 days of work. The tribunal assessed his fee at Rs. 1,00,000 and recognized the incurred expenses, totaling Rs. 2,65,000. Since the Financial Creditor had advanced Rs. 2,00,000, the IRP was entitled to an additional Rs. 65,000. The Corporate Debtor was directed to pay Rs. 2,00,000 to Sunrise 14 A/S Denmark and Rs. 65,000 to the IRP within 15 days.

        4. Withdrawal of Insolvency Application and restoration of the Corporate Debtor’s management:
        Considering the settlement, the tribunal exercised its inherent powers under Rule 11 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016, allowed the settlement, and set aside the impugned order dated 13th May 2019. Consequently, Company Petition No. IB-832(PB)/2018 filed by Sunrise 14 A/S, Denmark, was disposed of as withdrawn. The tribunal directed that if the settlement amount was not paid, the Financial Creditor could move for the revival of the CIRP and initiate contempt proceedings against the concerned parties.

        The tribunal also set aside all orders passed by the Adjudicating Authority, including the appointment of the IRP and the declaration of moratorium. The application under Section 7 of the I&B Code was disposed of as withdrawn, and the Corporate Debtor was released from all legal rigors, allowing it to function independently through its Board of Directors with immediate effect.

        Conclusion:
        The appeal was allowed with the aforementioned observations and directions, and no costs were imposed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found