Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the condition of prior deposit of twenty-five per cent of the additional demand under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was justified and whether the appeals disclosed any substantial question of law.
Analysis: The appeal provision under Section 62(5) required deposit of twenty-five per cent of the additional demand, penalty and interest before an appeal could be entertained, though the first appellate authority could grant waiver in appropriate cases of undue hardship. The demand in the present case was confined to tax, and the condition imposed by the appellate authorities for entertaining the appeal was found to be reasonable. The Tribunal had also granted further time to enable compliance. No perversity in the Tribunal's order was shown, and the challenge did not give rise to any substantial question of law.
Conclusion: The condition of pre-deposit was upheld, and the appeals were held to be without merit.