Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification application could be allowed by taking into account a binding High Court precedent on the validity of Notification No. 14/97-CE (NT) and the consequent restriction on Modvat credit.
Analysis: The notification limiting Modvat credit to the extent of duty calculated at 10% ad valorem was held illegal by the High Court, and the Tribunal noted that the goods in the present case had suffered duty at 15% ad valorem. As the High Court decision directly covered the issue, the earlier contrary conclusion could not stand and the notification-based restriction on credit was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The rectification application was allowed and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A restriction on Modvat credit under the impugned notification cannot be applied where the inputs were purchased on payment of duty at 15% ad valorem, since the High Court has declared the restrictive portion of the notification illegal and binding.