Mutilation of imported goods allowed for scrap clearance where material remained capable of scrap use and importer bore the cost.

Imported goods found to contain some serviceable portions were still treated as scrap where the material was capable of heavy melting use and the importer sought mutilation. Following a prior Tribunal approach, the note states that mutilation and clearance as scrap at the importer's cost was the course, rather than sustaining reclassification, value enhancement, confiscation, redemption fine, or penalty. The dispute was thus resolved in favour of allowing clearance of the goods as mutilated scrap.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported goods, found to contain some serviceable portions, could nevertheless be permitted to be cleared as scrap after mutilation at the importer's cost, and whether the order reclassifying the goods, enhancing value, confiscating them, and imposing penalty was sustainable.

Analysis: The reports of Chartered Engineers and the photographs indicated that part of the material was serviceable, but the goods were also capable of being used as heavy melting scrap. The appellant had sought mutilation so that the goods could be cleared as scrap, and a prior Tribunal decision had adopted that course in similar circumstances. Following that approach, the appropriate course was to permit mutilation and clearance as scrap at the importer's cost rather than uphold the adverse classification and consequential demands.

Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to clear the goods as scrap after mutilation at its own cost, and the impugned order was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was resolved in favour of the importer by allowing clearance of the goods as mutilated scrap, with the consequential reclassification, valuation enhancement, confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty not sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where imported material is capable of being treated as scrap and the importer seeks mutilation, the goods may be permitted to be mutilated and cleared as scrap at the importer's cost instead of sustaining a reclassification-based adverse order.

---