Treaty classification of consultancy services under the India-Uganda DTAA prevented tax deduction and disallowance.

Payments to non-resident individuals resident in Uganda for technical and consultancy services fell under Article 14 of the India-Uganda DTAA, not Article 12, because the treaty specifically treats independent personal services separately from fees for technical services. As the services were taxable only in Uganda on the facts stated, no tax deduction obligation arose under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The corresponding disallowance under section 40(a)(i) therefore could not be sustained and was deleted.

---

---

Issues: Whether payments made to non-resident individuals resident in Uganda were taxable as fees for technical services under the India-Uganda treaty and liable to tax deduction at source, and consequently disallowable under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The payments were made to three individuals resident in Uganda for technical and consultancy-related services. Article 12 of the India-Uganda DTAA covers royalties and fees for technical services, but expressly excludes payments for services mentioned in article 14. Article 14 applies to professional services and other independent personal services rendered by individuals and provides taxation only in the state of residence unless the fixed base or stay conditions in the source state are met. On the facts, the services fell within article 14 and not article 12. The treaty provision specific to independent personal services prevailed over the general provision dealing with fees for technical services. As the income was taxable in Uganda and not in India, no obligation to deduct tax arose under section 195, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not stand.

Conclusion: The payments were not chargeable to tax in India under article 12 of the treaty, tax was not deductible at source, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was deleted.

---