Tribunal ruling: Company demand set aside, excisable goods demand confirmed, penalties imposed. Directors not liable.

The tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 3,38,399/- on the company for seized goods, confirmed the demand of Rs. 1,73,625/- on excisable goods removed without payment, and imposed penalties. However, penalties on directors were dropped as their direct involvement in violations was not established.

---

---

Issues Involved:
- Demand of Central Excise Duty on seized goods
- Demand of Central Excise Duty on excisable goods removed without payment
- Imposition of interest under Section 11AA of CEA
- Imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of CEA/Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules
- Imposition of penalty on Directors under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules

Analysis:

Demand of Central Excise Duty on Seized Goods:
The case involved the seizure of 1806 bags from the appellant's premises by DGCEI officers, alleging non-accounting with intent to clear without payment of duty. The appellant argued that the goods were accounted for and intended for legitimate sale after discharging applicable duty. The tribunal noted that the bags were seized from the factory premises and not during transit, hence duty is payable only upon clearance from the factory. Citing precedent, the tribunal ruled that in the absence of evidence showing intent to evade duty, the demand of duty amounting to Rs. 3,38,399/- was set aside.

Demand of Central Excise Duty on Excisable Goods Removed Without Payment:
Regarding the demand of Rs. 1,73,625/- on 1479 bags allegedly removed without payment of duty, the appellant contended that these goods were manufactured by another entity below the duty threshold and sold through the appellant's premises. The tribunal found that the appellant failed to prove non-clandestine removal, as evidenced by the payment of the demanded duty and interest during the appeal. Consequently, the demand was confirmed, and equal penalty under Section 11AC was imposed.

Imposition of Penalty on Directors under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules:
The tribunal addressed the imposition of penalties on the directors of the company. The appellant argued that the directors were not directly involved in any violations mentioned in the rule. Relying on precedent, the tribunal held that unless a specific role of the directors in the violations is established, penalties under Rule 26 are not justified. Consequently, the penalties on the directors were set aside, each reduced to Rs. 50,000/-.

In conclusion, the tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 3,38,399/- on the company, confirmed the demand of Rs. 1,73,625/- along with penalties, and dropped the penalties imposed on the directors. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.

---