Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional order levying VAT by treating part of the turnover, including claimed inter-State sales of aerated water and fruit drinks, as taxable intra-State sales under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act was sustainable in the absence of an opportunity to produce supporting documentary evidence.
Analysis: The petitioner had been called upon to furnish sale details, but the revisional authority did not specifically require production of books of account, sales invoices, or other primary records before drawing an adverse inference. Mere absence of a break-up in the profit and loss account did not, by itself, justify treating inter-State sales as intra-State sales and levying VAT on the entire turnover. Although the burden lay on the dealer under Section 16 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act to establish that the turnover included non-taxable or lower-taxed sales, that burden had to be tested after affording a fair opportunity to produce documentary evidence.
Conclusion: The revisional order was unsustainable and was set aside. The matter was remanded to the revisional authority to examine the documentary evidence to be produced by the petitioner and to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.