Tribunal approves Resolution Plan by JM Financial & Reliance, extends moratorium, emphasizes CoC authority

The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan submitted by JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, subject to certain observations. The Resolution Professional was directed to continue in their role, the moratorium was extended, and the Monitoring Committee was appointed. The Tribunal dismissed various Interlocutory Applications filed during the proceedings, emphasizing the CoC's commercial decision-making authority.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Approval of the Resolution Plan.
2. Continuation of the Resolution Professional’s role.
3. Continuation of the moratorium.
4. Implementation of the Resolution Plan.
5. Appointment of the Monitoring Committee.
6. Grant of concessions, reliefs, and dispensations.
7. Cooperation of stakeholders.
8. Suspension of the powers of the suspended board of directors.
9. Various Interlocutory Applications (IAs) filed during the pendency of the main application.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Approval of the Resolution Plan:
The application for approval of the Resolution Plan was filed under Section 30(6) read with Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The Resolution Plan was submitted by JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Reliance Industries Limited. The plan was initially not approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) as it did not receive the requisite 75% voting share. However, after the amendment to Section 30(4) of the IBC, reducing the voting threshold to 66%, the plan received 72.192% of the voting share and was subsequently approved by the CoC. The Tribunal found that the Resolution Plan met the requirements of Section 31 read with Section 30(2) of the IBC and approved it with certain observations regarding specific clauses.

2. Continuation of the Resolution Professional’s Role:
The Tribunal ordered that the Resolution Professional (RP) should continue to conduct its role until the Resolution Applicants acquire control of the Corporate Debtor. This continuation ensures that the RP has all powers, duties, and protections available under the IBC and related regulations.

3. Continuation of the Moratorium:
The Tribunal directed that the moratorium declared under Section 14 of the IBC should continue until the Resolution Applicants acquire control of the Corporate Debtor. This measure is to ensure that the Corporate Debtor remains a going concern during the transition period.

4. Implementation of the Resolution Plan:
The Tribunal directed the Resolution Applicants to implement the Resolution Plan as set out. The plan includes payment of insolvency resolution process costs, management of the Corporate Debtor, and dealing with the interests of all stakeholders.

5. Appointment of the Monitoring Committee:
The Tribunal approved the appointment of a Monitoring Committee (MC) to oversee the Corporate Debtor from the date of the approval of the Resolution Plan until the Resolution Applicants acquire control. The MC is to be protected against any suits, legal proceedings, or liabilities in good faith compliance with the IBC and other applicable laws.

6. Grant of Concessions, Reliefs, and Dispensations:
The Tribunal did not grant the reliefs and concessions sought under Clause 11 of the Resolution Plan, stating that these are subject to the jurisdiction of various competent authorities. The Resolution Applicants may approach the appropriate authorities for necessary approvals.

7. Cooperation of Stakeholders:
The Tribunal directed all stakeholders to cooperate with the Resolution Applicants and the MC to keep the Corporate Debtor a going concern and to implement the Resolution Plan as approved.

8. Suspension of the Powers of the Suspended Board of Directors:
The Tribunal ordered that the powers of the suspended board of directors of the Corporate Debtor shall remain suspended until the Resolution Applicants acquire control of the Corporate Debtor.

9. Various Interlocutory Applications (IAs):
Several IAs were filed during the pendency of the main application, raising various grievances. The Tribunal dismissed these IAs, stating that they were not maintainable and were filed at a belated stage. The Tribunal emphasized the primacy of the CoC’s commercial decision and noted that the IAs did not present any valid grounds to interfere with the approved Resolution Plan.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan submitted by JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, subject to certain observations. The Resolution Professional was directed to continue in their role, the moratorium was extended, and the Monitoring Committee was appointed. The Tribunal dismissed various IAs filed during the pendency of the main application, reaffirming the primacy of the CoC’s commercial decision.

---