Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessees entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest income from investments.</h1> <h3>The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2 (1) Trivandrum. Versus M/s. Postal Telecom BSNL Employees Co-op. Society Ltd. And (Vice-Versa) And The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2 (2) Trivandrum. Versus M/s. Avanakuzhy Service Co-op. Society And (Vice-Versa) And The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2 (1) Trivandrum. Versus M/s. Government Secretariat Staff Co-op Society Ltd., M/s. Kerala University Employees Co-op Society Limited, M/s. Ananthapuri Co-op Society, M/s. Manickal Service Coop. Bank Limited</h3> The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2 (1) Trivandrum. Versus M/s. Postal Telecom BSNL Employees Co-op. Society Ltd. And (Vice-Versa) And The Income Tax ... Issues Involved:1. Whether the CIT(A) is justified in directing the Assessing Officer to grant deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act in respect of interest income received by the assessee on investments made with Sub-Treasuries, District Co-operative Banks, Other Banks, etc.Detailed Analysis:Background:The appeals by the Revenue and cross objections by the assessees, M/s. Postal Telecom BSNL Employees Co-op Society Ltd. and M/s. Avanakuzhy Service Co-op Society, were consolidated due to the common issue involved. The assessees are primary agricultural credit societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, engaged in banking and providing credit facilities to their members. The Assessing Officer (AO) had treated the interest income from investments with treasury and banks as 'income from other sources,' thereby denying the deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act.CIT(A) Decision:The CIT(A) followed the Cochin Bench Tribunal's decision in the case of Kizhathadiyoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. for the assessment year 2009-2010, which held that interest income from investments with Treasury and Banks is part of the banking activity and eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i).Revenue's Appeal:The Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s decision, arguing that the interest income should be assessed as 'income from other sources' and not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).Assessee's Argument:The assessees contended that the issue is covered in their favor by several judicial pronouncements, including:- CIT v. Karnataka State Co-operative Bank [251 ITR 194 (SC)]- Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. v CIT [(2017) 396 ITR 371 (Telangana and Andhra Pradesh High Court)]- Muttom Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. (ITA No.372/Coch/2010)- Mundakkayam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. (ITA No.106/Coch/2016)- The Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (ITA No.495/Coch/2017)Tribunal's Analysis:The Tribunal considered whether the interest income from investments should be assessed under 'income from other sources' or 'income from business.' If assessed under 'income from business,' the assessees would be entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i).1. Judicial Precedents:- The Tribunal referred to its previous decisions and other judicial pronouncements, including the Karnataka High Court's decision in Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamamitha vs ITO, which clarified that primary agricultural credit societies or primary cooperative agricultural and rural development banks without an RBI banking license are not hit by section 80P(4) and are eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).- The Tribunal also noted the distinction made by the Karnataka High Court in the case of Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd., differentiating it from the Supreme Court's decision in Totgars Cooperative Sales Society Ltd.2. Cochin Bench Decisions:- The Tribunal reiterated the Cochin Bench's decisions in cases like Kizhathadiyoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Muttom Service Cooperative Bank Ltd., which supported the assessees' claim for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).3. Circular No. 18/2015:- The Tribunal referenced the CBDT Circular No. 18/2015, which clarified that interest income from investments by banking concerns is attributable to the business of banking and falls under 'Profits and gains of business and profession.'4. Telangana & Andhra Pradesh High Court Decision:- The Tribunal cited the recent decision of the Telangana & Andhra Pradesh High Court in Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. v CIT, which supported the view that interest income from investments by co-operative societies engaged in providing credit facilities to members is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the assessees are entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest income received on investments made with sub-treasuries and banks. The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, and the cross objections by the assessees were rendered infructuous or dismissed.Final Order:The appeals filed by the Revenue and the cross objections filed by the assessees were dismissed. The Tribunal's order was pronounced on April 30, 2019.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found