Tribunal sets aside Service Tax demand, aligns with Works Contract Service rules.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Service Tax demand and penalties. It determined the contract was composite and fell under Works Contract Service from 01/06/2007, aligning with the Supreme Court's ruling. The Tribunal directed verification of Service Tax recovery from the contract party, emphasizing any recovery should be paid to the Government.

---

---

Issues:
1. Liability of Service Tax on a composite contract for construction services.
2. Applicability of Works Contract Service for Service Tax assessment.
3. Recovery of Service Tax from the contract party.

Analysis:
1. The appellant, a public sector undertaking, entered into a contract with NTPC for construction services, leading to a Service Tax dispute. The Department claimed Service Tax under "Commercial or Industrial Construction Service," but the appellant argued it was a composite contract not liable for Service Tax.
2. The appellant contended that as per the Supreme Court's decision, composite contracts are assessable under "Works Contract Service," effective from 01/06/2007. The Tribunal agreed, stating that pre-2007 demands cannot be taxed under this category, aligning with the Supreme Court's ruling.
3. The Tribunal noted the contract specified Sales Tax on a Works Contract basis, indicating a composite nature. It directed the Adjudicating Authority to verify if Service Tax was actually recovered from NTPC, stating any such recovery should be paid to the Government.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the Service Tax demand and penalties, allowing the appeal based on the composite nature of the contract and the applicability of Works Contract Service from 01/06/2007. The judgment emphasized the need for proper verification of Service Tax recovery from the contract party.

---