Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the period during which the rectification application remained pending had to be excluded while computing limitation for the appeal under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and whether the appeal was therefore within time.
Analysis: The rectification application was filed after service of the assessment order and remained pending for 21 days before rejection. The pendency of such rectification proceedings was held to be excluded for computing the 60-day appellate limitation. On that calculation, the appeal filed thereafter fell within time. The refusal to rectify left the original assessment order intact, but did not bar the statutory appeal against the assessment order once the excluded period was accounted for.
Conclusion: The appeal was held to be within limitation, and the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred was set aside in favour of the assessee.