Fertilizer classification upheld where lab tests and supporting evidence showed compliance, defeating the chemical classification challenge.

Potassium Nitrate and Mono Potassium Phosphate were held to be correctly classifiable as fertilizers under Chapter 31, not as chemicals under Chapter 28, because contemporaneous laboratory testing showed compliance with the Fertilizer Control Orders. The appellate authority also relied on buyers' actual use of the goods as fertilizers and the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner's report supporting fertilizer classification. In the absence of any contrary technical evidence from the Revenue, the laboratory report and corroborating material were accepted, and the challenge to Chapter 31 classification failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether Potassium Nitrate and Mono Potassium Phosphate were correctly classifiable under Chapter 28 as chemicals or under Chapter 31 as fertilizers.

Analysis: The goods were tested in the Fertilizer Testing Laboratory, Pune, and the test results showed that they satisfied the parameters prescribed under the Fertilizer Control Orders. The appellate authority also considered the buyers' use of the goods as fertilizers and the report of the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner, which supported classification under Chapter 31. In the absence of any contrary test report from the Revenue, the laboratory report and supporting evidence were accepted, and no infirmity was found in the conclusion that the products were fertilizers.

Conclusion: The products were rightly classified under Chapter 31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and the Revenue's challenge to classification under Chapter 28 failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where contemporaneous laboratory evidence and supporting material establish that goods satisfy fertilizer parameters, and the Revenue produces no contrary technical evidence, classification under the fertilizer entry is justified over a competing chemical classification.

---