Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Income-tax Officer could refuse to grant a certificate under section 230A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the ground that acquisition proceedings in respect of the property were under challenge before the Supreme Court and whether such refusal was based on irrelevant considerations.
Analysis: The application for the certificate was accompanied by a statement that no tax was outstanding under the relevant enactments referred to in section 230A, and this assertion was not denied. The refusal was founded only on the pendency of possible proceedings before the Supreme Court in acquisition litigation. The clearance certificate under section 230A turns on whether there is any outstanding tax liability under the specified Acts, or whether satisfactory provision has been made for its payment. A possible future special leave petition in a different proceeding was not a matter germane to that inquiry.
Conclusion: The refusal was unsustainable as it rested on extraneous and irrelevant considerations. The impugned order was set aside and the Income-tax Officer was directed to reconsider the application only on the statutory test under section 230A(1) and, if satisfied that no liability was outstanding or proper provision had been made, to grant the certificate.