Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowable where the assessee claimed to have invested sale consideration in construction of a bungalow on land gifted by his mother, and the revenue denied the claim on the ground that the gift deed was unregistered and the land was not in the assessee's name.
Analysis: The assessee produced the construction permission, approved plan, construction agreement, payment receipts, and completion certificate, all showing that the construction was undertaken in the names of the assessee and his brother and that the investment was made out of the sale consideration. On these facts, the relevant inquiry was whether the assessee had invested in construction of the residential house for the purpose of section 54F, and not merely whether the land stood in his name. The cases relied upon by the revenue were distinguishable because, in those matters, the assessee had failed to show any title or supporting evidence connecting him with the property, whereas the present record established the construction and investment nexus.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the disallowance was not sustainable.