Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal includes unclaimed buyer discounts in paper manufacturer's excise duty valuation.</h1> <h3>JK Paper Ltd. Versus C.C.E & S.T., Surat-ii</h3> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of writing and printing paper, in a case involving the interpretation of transaction value ... Valuation - inclusion of value of cash discount not availed by the buyers in assessable value - case of the department is that the cash discount which was not availed by the buyers is part and partial of the transaction value - Held that:- Cash discount is additional discount that in case the buyer make the payment within 4 days from the date of sale, 2% discount is given and in case payment is made in 14 days, 1% discount is given. Being conditional discount operated only when time line given, but the discount is not given to if the payment is not made within the stipulated time i.e. 4 days or 14 days, as the case may be, the scheme of discount is not operated, in such a case - Amount of discount initially offered by the appellant, which was subsequently paid by the buyer shall become part and partial of transaction value falling under the definition of transaction value given in Section 4 of Central Excise Act 1994. Cash discount which is not at or prior to clearance of goods being contained in agreement of sale between assessee and buyers must, therefore, be deducted from sale price in order to know the value of excisable goods at time. Hence, cash discount was deductible. Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. Issues:- Interpretation of transaction value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1994- Inclusion of cash discount not availed by buyers in the transaction value- Applicability of excise duty on the discounted priceInterpretation of Transaction Value:The case involved a manufacturer of writing and printing paper registered with Central Excise, who faced a demand for excise duty due to the treatment of cash discounts not availed by buyers as part of the transaction value. The appellant had a cash discount policy where discounts were offered for prompt payment. The appellant contended that duty should be paid only on the discounted price, as per Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1994. The appellant argued that the price payable at the time of sale was the discounted price, and therefore, only that price should be considered the transaction value. The appellant cited various judicial precedents supporting their interpretation.Inclusion of Cash Discount in Transaction Value:The Revenue, represented by a Superintendent, maintained the findings of the impugned order, asserting that the cash discount not availed by buyers should be considered part of the transaction value. The Tribunal analyzed the nature of the cash discount, noting that it was conditional and operated only when the payment was made within the stipulated time frame. The Tribunal concluded that if the discount was not availed due to late payment, the discount amount became payable and should be included in the transaction value under Section 4(3)(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1994.Applicability of Excise Duty on Discounted Price:After considering the arguments from both sides and examining the relevant legal provisions, the Tribunal found that the discount amount not availed by buyers should indeed be included in the assessable value. Citing the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Purolator India Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized that the transaction value should be determined at the time of clearance of goods from the factory or depot. The Tribunal held that the cash discount, even if not paid at the time of sale, should be deducted from the sale price to ascertain the value of excisable goods. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court.This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues addressed by the Tribunal concerning the interpretation of transaction value, the inclusion of cash discounts in the value calculation, and the applicability of excise duty on the discounted price, providing a detailed insight into the legal reasoning and precedents considered in reaching the decision.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found