Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal Allowed: Taxability of Inward Freight Charges under GTA Services /2004-ST</h1> <h3>M/s Bhima SSK Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal dated 23.01.2015, regarding the taxability of inward freight charges under GTA services. ... GTA Service - freight charges - charges paid for each consignment less than threshold limit - failure to discharge service tax - Held that:- his Tribunal in the appellant's own case for the earlier period BHIMA SAHAKARI KARKHANA LTD VERSUS CCE, PUNE-III [2015 (10) TMI 627 - CESTAT MUMBAI] considered the issue of taxability of the inward freight charges paid when the amount paid for transportation in each consignment was less than ₹ 750/- and for a single carriage is less than ₹ 750/- - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. Issues:- Appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. PUN-SVTAX-000-APP-0010-14-15 dated 23.01.2015- Taxability of inward freight charges under GTA services- Interpretation of Notification No. 33/2004-ST dated 03.12.2004- Precedent set by Tribunal in Bhima SSK Ltd. caseAnalysis:1. The appeal was filed against Order-in-Appeal No. PUN-SVTAX-000-APP-0010-14-15 dated 23.01.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (Appeals), Pune. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing excisable goods and providing taxable services, was alleged to have failed to discharge Service Tax on freight charges under the taxable category of GTA services. A show-cause notice was issued for recovery of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 14,33,925/- along with interest and penalty. The demand was confirmed with interest and penalty after adjudication, leading the appellant to file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), which was subsequently rejected.2. The appellant contended that during the relevant period, they had paid inward freight for transportation services, with charges for each consignment being less than Rs. 750/- and the freight amount paid for single goods carriage being less than Rs. 1500/-, falling under the purview of Notification No. 33/2004-ST dated 03.12.2004. The appellant referred to a previous Tribunal decision in Bhima SSK Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III, where a similar issue was decided in their favor. The Tribunal's order in the appellant's favor was followed subsequently, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief, if any, as per the law.3. The Tribunal noted that in the appellant's previous case for the earlier period, the issue of taxability of inward freight charges paid when the amount for transportation in each consignment was less than Rs. 750/- and for a single carriage was less than Rs. 750/- had been decided in their favor. The Tribunal's decision in the earlier case was followed in the present matter, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the precedent set by the Tribunal in the Bhima SSK Ltd. case.4. In conclusion, the Tribunal, consisting of Dr. D.M. Misra and Mr. P Anjani Kumar, allowed the appeal filed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 23.01.2015, based on the interpretation of Notification No. 33/2004-ST and the precedent set by the Tribunal in a similar case. The appellant's argument regarding the taxability of inward freight charges under GTA services was upheld, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting consequential relief as per the law.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found