Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Approves Demerger Scheme of Arrangement: Key Details and Conditions</h1> <h3>In Re : TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED AND BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED</h3> The Tribunal approved the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving the demerger of undertakings and issuance ... Scheme of Amalgamation - approval of the Scheme of Arrangement - Held that:- Considering the approval accorded by the members and creditors of the Petitioner Companies to the proposed Scheme, and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Income Tax Department and the Department of Telecommunication, there appears to be no impediment in sanctioning the present Scheme. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme under Section 230 & 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Petitioners shall however remain bound to comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. Notwithstanding the above, if there is any deficiency found or, violation committed qua any enactment, statutory rule or regulation, the sanction granted by this court to the scheme will not come in the way of action being taken, albeit, in accordance with law, against the concerned persons, directors and officials of the petitioners. Issues Involved:1. Approval of the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013.2. Compliance with procedural requirements for convening meetings and notifications.3. Objections from an unsecured creditor and its locus standi.4. No objections from the Regional Director and Income Tax Department.5. Conditions imposed by the Department of Telecommunications (DOT).6. Compliance with DOT's conditions and undertakings by the petitioner companies.7. Absence of pending proceedings under the Companies Act.8. Conformity of the Accounting Treatment with Accounting Standards.9. Final approval and compliance with statutory requirements.10. Transfer of properties, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties to the transferee companies.Detailed Analysis:1. Approval of the Scheme of Arrangement:The joint application was filed under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking approval for a Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme involved the demerger of two undertakings from the Transferor Company to two Transferee Companies, with the issuance of redeemable preference shares to the shareholders of the Transferor Company.2. Compliance with Procedural Requirements:The Tribunal had initially directed the convening of meetings of creditors and shareholders and required publication in specified newspapers. The petitioners complied with these directions, as evidenced by affidavits confirming the publication and service of notices to relevant authorities.3. Objections from an Unsecured Creditor:An objection was raised by an unsecured creditor with a claim of Rs. 24,67,253. However, this amount constituted less than 5% of the total outstanding debt of the Transferee Company No. 1, rendering the creditor ineligible to object under Section 230(4) of the Companies Act, 2013.4. No Objections from Authorities:The Regional Director and the Income Tax Department filed representations indicating no objections to the Scheme. The DOT, however, imposed several conditions for the approval of the Scheme.5. Conditions Imposed by DOT:The DOT's conditions included a one-year period for the transfer/merger, compliance with lock-in conditions, unchanged spectrum validity, market share limitations, payment of differential spectrum fees, submission of bank guarantees, and adherence to spectrum caps and guidelines.6. Compliance with DOT's Conditions:The petitioner companies undertook to comply with the DOT's conditions as per the Scheme. They also confirmed the surrender of administratively allocated spectrum and submitted required undertakings to the DOT.7. Absence of Pending Proceedings:The petitioners affirmed that no proceedings for inspection, inquiry, or investigation under the Companies Act were pending against them.8. Conformity with Accounting Standards:Certificates from statutory auditors confirmed that the Accounting Treatment proposed in the Scheme conformed to the Accounting Standards notified by the Central Government under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013.9. Final Approval and Compliance:The Tribunal, considering the approvals from members, creditors, and authorities, found no impediment in sanctioning the Scheme. The petitioners were directed to comply with statutory requirements and were reminded that the sanction does not exempt them from any legal obligations, including payment of taxes and other charges.10. Transfer of Properties, Rights, Powers, Liabilities, and Duties:The Tribunal ordered the transfer of all properties, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties of the Demerged Undertakings to the respective Transferee Companies without further act or deed, pursuant to Section 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The order also specified that any pending proceedings related to the Demerged Undertakings would continue against the Transferee Companies.The petition was disposed of with directions for the petitioner companies to deliver a certified copy of the order to the Registrar of Companies within thirty days. The Tribunal also allowed any person to apply for necessary directions in the matter.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found