Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal overturns time-barred appeal rejection, emphasizing fair hearing and proper consideration.</h1> <h3>The Chief Officer Town Panchayat Versus Commissioner Of Central Tax, Mysuru Commissionerate</h3> The Tribunal set aside the order rejecting the appeal as time-barred and remanded the case to the Commissioner (A) for consideration on the merits. The ... Maintainability of appeal - appeal was dismissed on the ground of time bar holding that the appeal before the Commissioner was filed beyond prescribed period - non-service of order-in-original - Held that:- In the impugned order, the Ld. Commissioner (A) has not considered at all the submissions made by the appellant in their application seeking Condonation of Delay in filing the appeal before him - Further, when the appellant’s accounts were freezed on the basis of Order-in-Original then they came to know about the said order and thereafter, they moved an application for obtaining the order which is alleged to have been served on them on 30.01.2017 but there is no proof of the said service - Further, even the adjudication order was passed without giving sufficient opportunity to the appellant to put up their defence. Matter remanded to the Commissioner (A) to decide the appeal on merits - appeal allowed by way of remand. Issues involved:1. Appeal against rejection of appeal as time-barred without considering merits.2. Appellant's contention of delay in filing appeal and grounds for seeking Condonation of Delay.3. Department's defense of appeal being time-barred.4. Lack of consideration of submissions by Commissioner (A) in the impugned order.5. Appellant's claim of not receiving the impugned order and lack of proof of service.6. Passing of adjudication order without providing sufficient opportunity for defense.Issue 1: The appeal was directed against the rejection of the appellant's appeal as time-barred without delving into the merits of the case. The appellant, a local authority, had leased out properties and collected rent, with the rental income always below ten lakhs, thus not paying Service Tax or obtaining registration under the Finance Act. The Department issued a show cause notice proposing Service Tax demand and penalties, leading to the appellant filing an appeal before the Commissioner (A), which was rejected as time-barred by the Commissioner (A).Issue 2: The appellant argued that the impugned order was unsustainable as it did not consider the facts and law properly. The appellant sought Condonation of Delay due to not receiving the Order-in-Original, frequent transfer of chief officers, and lack of intention to miss the appeal deadline. The appellant claimed the impugned order was known only after a bank account freeze notice, with no proof of service of the order on 30.01.2017. The appellant also highlighted the lack of proper opportunity to present their case during the adjudication process.Issue 3: The Department defended the time-barred appeal, stating it was rightly dismissed by the Commissioner (A) due to being filed beyond the prescribed period.Issue 4: The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (A) did not consider the appellant's submissions in the Condonation of Delay application, where the appellant stated not receiving the impugned order and the frequent transfer of chief officers. The Tribunal found that the impugned order's reliance on a letter not provided to the appellant was incorrect.Issue 5: The Tribunal found that the appellant's claims of not receiving the impugned order and lack of proof of service raised doubts about the validity of the time bar decision. The Tribunal also noted the lack of sufficient opportunity for the appellant to present their defense during the adjudication process.The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order dismissing the appeal as time-barred was not sustainable in law. The Tribunal set aside the order and allowed the appeal by remanding it to the Commissioner (A) to decide on the merits. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of considering all submissions and providing adequate opportunities for defense.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found