Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer could be restrained from passing the final order of penalty under Section 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, while the assessee's appeals on the underlying tax dispute were pending before the Tribunal.
Analysis: The penalty proceedings arose out of the same controversy regarding the obligation to deduct tax at source, and the quantum dispute was still sub judice before the Tribunal. The Court noted that the Tribunal had already directed that penalty proceedings may continue but the final penalty order should not be passed for the time being. To avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to protect both sides while the appeals remained pending, the Court found it appropriate to continue that restraint in the present matter. The Court also recorded that the assessee was complying with the recovery conditions imposed in the assessment proceedings.
Conclusion: The Assessing Officer was directed not to pass the final penalty order until the assessee's appeals before the Tribunal for assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18 were decided, though the penalty proceedings could continue up to that stage.