Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum credited to the "dividend reserve" account was a reserve within rule 1(iii) of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, so as to be included in the computation of capital.
Analysis: The amount in question had been found by the Tribunal to have been segregated as a reserve for future declaration of dividend, and that finding of fact was not challenged. The revenue sought to rely on a balance-sheet and on a further factual enquiry to contend that the amount represented only a provision for contingent liability or proposed dividend, but those basic facts had not been found by the authorities below and were not part of the statement of case. In the reference jurisdiction, the court declined to reopen the matter on fresh material and accepted the Tribunal's factual finding that the amount stood as a reserve.
Conclusion: The amount was a reserve within rule 1(iii) of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In a reference, an amount segregated as a reserve and found as such by the Tribunal must be treated as a reserve for surtax purposes unless that finding is disturbed on the record, and the court will not base a contrary conclusion on fresh facts not found below.