Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether advance deposit of central excise duty and unutilised MODVAT credit standing in the account current constituted actual payment of duty so as to qualify for deduction under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Court followed the Supreme Court's view that deposit of central excise duty in the prescribed account current is a statutory payment mechanism and, once deposited, the amount stands credited to the Revenue and is not under the assessee's control. The deduction under section 43B depends on actual payment, and the legislative object is satisfied when the duty is irretrievably deposited, even if adjustments are made later against clearances. The Court also relied on its earlier view that duty deposited in the account current cannot be treated as a mere advance when the liability has already crystallised on manufacture and the amount is non-refundable.
Conclusion: The advance deposit of excise duty and the unutilised MODVAT credit qualified as actual payment for section 43B purposes, and the disallowance was not sustainable; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.