Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denial of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) required reconsideration in view of the amendment to section 18 of the Karnataka State Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and the treatment of nominal or associate members.
Analysis: The Assessing Officer and the first appellate authority denied the deduction on the premise that the assessee dealt with nominal and associate members and that the Supreme Court decision relied upon by the Revenue governed the controversy. The Tribunal noted that the appellate authority had not dealt with the assessee's specific contention that the Karnataka State Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 permits nominal members and that the 2014 and 2016 amendments to section 18 were said to concern associate members rather than nominal members. Since the effect of those amendments on the claim under section 80P had not been examined, the matter required fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer.
Conclusion: The disallowance was not finally affirmed on merits and the issue of allowability of deduction under section 80P was remanded for de novo examination.