Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal: Interest Income Disallowance & Deductions Clarified for Cooperative Society</h1> <h3>Apollo Tyres Employees Multipurpose Consumer Co-operative Credit Society ltd., Apollo Tyres Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward-3 (1) (2), Baroda</h3> Apollo Tyres Employees Multipurpose Consumer Co-operative Credit Society ltd., Apollo Tyres Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward-3 (1) (2), Baroda - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of interest income earned on fixed deposits with nationalized banks.2. Disallowance of interest income received from Income Tax Department under section 244A.Analysis:1. The appellant, a cooperative society, filed its return of income declaring NIL income and claimed deduction under section 80P(2) of the Income Tax Act for interest income earned on fixed deposits with nationalized banks. The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the claim, stating that the interest income did not qualify for deduction as it was not derived from the society's main activity of providing credit facilities to its members. The AO made an addition to the appellant's income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the AO's decision, citing a judgment by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court. The Tribunal concurred with the lower authorities, stating that interest earned from investments in nationalized banks by a cooperative society is not deductible under section 80P(2)(a)(i). However, the Tribunal allowed any expenditure incurred by the appellant for earning such income to be considered for deduction. The Tribunal upheld the orders of the Revenue on this issue.2. Regarding the interest income received under section 244A of the Act, the Tribunal held that since this income was not related to the activities of the appellant-society, it was not eligible for exemption. The AO's decision to add this income was deemed appropriate. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the charging of interest under sections 234A and 234B was mandatory, and the levy of interest was consequential. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest income earned on fixed deposits with nationalized banks and interest income received under section 244A. The Tribunal emphasized that interest earned from investments in nationalized banks by a cooperative society does not qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and that any expenditure incurred for earning such income could be considered for deduction. The decision to levy interest under sections 234A and 234B was deemed appropriate due to their mandatory nature.