Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court denies input tax credit due to non-disclosure and non-compliance</h1> The Court upheld the denial of input tax credit to the petitioner, a dealer in electrical items, due to non-disclosure of incentives and failure to comply ... Input Tax Credit - assessee received incentives from its manufacturer - disallowance of the discount despite filing of credit notes and declaration as per Circular No. 41/2007 - applicability of instructions contained in Circular 41/2007 to dealers like the petitioner - failure to account the turnover - Held that:- Having gone through Form No. 9, we are of the opinion that it is not confined to a mere transaction of return of goods. Rule 59 and section 41 read together would only indicate that if a credit note is issued on return of goods, then it should be in Form No. 9. This is not to say that the form prescribed for credit note under the Act is exclusively for the purpose of return of goods. A reading of the form and the various details enumerated therein would also indicate that, the form would take in all instances where a credit note is issued, based on which a claim is raised by an assessee. The credit note having not been issued in the prescribed form, there is no question of an input tax credit being granted with respect to the incentive, as has been held by the AO. We are of the opinion that the Tribunal has rightly confirmed the order of the AO. The question of law with respect to Circular No. 41/2007 would not arise since the assessee had not made a claim with the prescribed form. Though the amounts were disclosed in the books of account, discrepancy was noticed in the audit statement and the petitioner did not attempt a revised return under section 42 of the Act - the questions of law raised are to be answered against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue. Issues:1. Input tax credit refusal by the Kerala Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal.2. Disallowance of discount despite filing credit notes and declaration.3. Applicability of circular instructions to dealers.4. Failure to account for turnover despite being in books of accounts.Analysis:Issue 1: Input Tax Credit RefusalThe petitioner, a dealer in electrical items, claimed input tax credit for tax paid on goods purchased from the manufacturer. An incentive of Rs. 11,18,322 was not disclosed by the petitioner. The Assessing Officer (AO) found a reduction necessary due to non-disclosure of the incentive in returns filed. The petitioner did not revise returns despite discrepancies in the audited statement, leading to the denial of input tax credit.Issue 2: Disallowance of DiscountThe petitioner contended that the incentive received was for sales targets and distribution expenses. Credit notes were submitted but not in the prescribed Form No. 9. The AO did not acknowledge any declaration from the manufacturer. The Senior Government Pleader argued that Form No. 9 is mandatory for credit notes and no revision of returns was made based on the audit statement, disallowing the input tax credit.Issue 3: Applicability of Circular InstructionsCircular No. 41/2007 allowed input tax credit for expenses reimbursed through credit notes without output tax deduction. The circular was initially for cement dealers but extended to all dealers based on a court ruling. The failure to adhere to the circular's conditions led to the denial of input tax credit.Issue 4: Failure to Account for TurnoverThe High Court examined Form No. 9 and ruled that it is not limited to return of goods transactions. As the credit note was not issued in the prescribed form, the input tax credit was rightly denied. The failure to follow the prescribed form and lack of necessary details in the credit notes supported the Tribunal's decision.In conclusion, the Court dismissed the revision, upholding the denial of input tax credit due to non-compliance with prescribed forms and failure to revise returns despite discrepancies. The questions of law were decided against the assessee, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory requirements for claiming tax benefits.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found