Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Gujarat HC rules GST amendment prospective, dismisses petition as infructuous.</h1> <h3>ZAVERI AND CO PVT LTD Versus UNION OF INDIA</h3> The Gujarat HC disposed of a petition challenging a GST rule amendment, ruling it to be prospective and rendering the grievance against its retrospective ... Retrospective effect of rule 96 (10) (b) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Held that:- Vide Notification No. 54/2018-Central Tax dated 9.10.2018, sub-rule (10) of rule 96 has been substituted making it applicable prospectively - It was submitted that, since the grievance of the petitioner was against the retrospective effect given to rule 96, such grievance no longer survives - petition dismissed. The Gujarat High Court disposed of the petition challenging rule 96 (10) (b) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 as the rule was amended to be applicable prospectively, making the grievance against its retrospective effect irrelevant. The petition was deemed infructuous and notice was discharged with no costs.