Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether quarrying of granite metal amounts to "mining" for the purposes of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. (ii) Whether high speed diesel used in the quarrying activity remained eligible for concessional treatment under the Central Sales Tax Act after the GST regime and the amended definition of goods.
Issue (i): Whether quarrying of granite metal amounts to "mining" for the purposes of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: The term "mining" was construed in its fiscal setting and in common parlance, not by importing a narrow distinction drawn for regulatory or safety purposes under mining enactments. The statutory and judicial materials showed that open cast working and underground excavation are both forms of extraction from the earth, and the regulatory distinction between mines and quarries does not control the meaning of "mining" in the sales tax context. The purpose of the concessional provision is to reduce tax burden on inter-State purchases used in specified activities, and that purpose would be frustrated by excluding quarrying merely because the activity is carried on by open cast working.
Conclusion: Quarrying of granite metal falls within "mining" for the purposes of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Issue (ii): Whether high speed diesel used in the quarrying activity remained eligible for concessional treatment under the Central Sales Tax Act after the GST regime and the amended definition of goods.
Analysis: The amended definition of goods under the Central Sales Tax Act was held to be relevant for resale cases, but not to cut down the wider class of goods used in the specified activities of manufacture, processing, mining, telecommunications, and power generation. High speed diesel remained a retained petroleum product under the sales tax regime, and the continued operation of the relevant GST provisions did not take away the concession for inter-State purchases used in quarrying. The absence of a separate KGST registration did not defeat the claim, because the assessee held CST registration and the claim concerned inter-State purchases for use in the quarrying activity.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the concessional rate under the Central Sales Tax Act for high speed diesel used in its quarrying activity, and the authorities' refusal to restore the CST registration entry was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the registration was directed to be restored with the relevant HSD entry, thereby granting the assessee the concessional CST benefit for inter-State purchases used in quarrying.
Ratio Decidendi: For interpreting a concessional fiscal provision, "mining" includes quarrying when both involve extraction from the earth, and the post-GST restriction on the definition of goods does not exclude retained petroleum products used in such specified activities from concessional CST treatment.