Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal classifies 'green pepper' as vegetable, not spice, under Customs Tariff Act</h1> <h3>M/s Herbal Isolates Pvt Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs</h3> M/s Herbal Isolates Pvt Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs - 2019 (365) E.L.T. 820 (Tri. - Bang.) Issues Involved:1. Classification of 'green pepper' under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.2. Applicability of penal consequences for incorrect declaration.3. Appropriateness of the re-classification by the assessing authority.Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of 'Green Pepper' under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975:The appellant, M/s Herbal Isolates Pvt Ltd, classified their import of 'green pepper' under heading no. 0709 99 10 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, which pertains to 'Other Vegetables, Fresh or Chilled.' However, the assessing authority re-classified it under heading no. 0904 11 90 as 'other pepper (genus Piper), neither crushed nor ground' under the chapter titled 'Coffee, Tea, Mate and Spices.'The appellant argued that 'green pepper' in its raw form should be classified under chapter 7, as it is imported in bunches from Sri Lanka and processed before export. They emphasized the specific entry for 'green pepper' in the Indian Customs Tariff Act and the principle of 'most specific description' in rule 3 of the General Rules for the Interpretation of the Harmonised System. The appellant also cited previous imports classified under chapter 7 and a Tribunal decision in Collector of Customs, Cochin v. Mermaid Foods, which held that 'green pepper in brine' is not subject to cess under the Spices Board Act, 1986.The respondent contended that chapter 9 is exclusively for spices and that 'green pepper' from a spice plant is excluded from chapter 7. They argued that the essential oils and aromatic principles in 'green pepper' classify it as a spice.The Tribunal found that the tariff item used by customs authorities is a residuary and that the appellant's classification is unambiguous. The Supreme Court's decision in Dunlop India Ltd & Madras Rubber Factory Ltd v. Union of India and Others was cited, emphasizing that a product should be classified under a specific heading rather than a residuary clause. The Tribunal concluded that 'green pepper' should not be classified as a spice in chapter 9 but as a vegetable in chapter 7, consistent with the legislative intent and common understanding.2. Applicability of Penal Consequences for Incorrect Declaration:The Tribunal noted that the import consignments were processed for export, and any alteration in duty from re-classification would be academic. Even if the advance authorization were invalid, the export consignments would be entitled to neutralization of all duties involved in production. Therefore, the penal consequences for incorrect declaration were not pressed or agitated before the Tribunal.3. Appropriateness of the Re-classification by the Assessing Authority:The Tribunal scrutinized the rationale behind the re-classification by the assessing authority. They found that the inclusion in note 2 of chapter 7, with corresponding exclusion in note 4, was a deliberate measure to eliminate doubts about the classification of genus Capsicum and genus Pimenta. The absence of a specific heading for these varieties indicated the legislative intent to classify 'green pepper' as a vegetable until processed. The Tribunal concluded that the misconception that 'green pepper' is a spice until processed should not obstruct endorsing the appellant's declaration in the bills of entry.Conclusion:The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, finding them lacking logic and legal sanctity. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, to the extent applicable, affirming the classification of 'green pepper' under chapter 7 as a vegetable and not a spice.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found