Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants deduction for interest income but denies for miscellaneous income due to lack of evidence.

        NTT Data Global Delivery Services Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle-13 (1), New Delhi

        NTT Data Global Delivery Services Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle-13 (1), New Delhi - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Eligibility of interest income for deduction under Section 10A/10AA.
        2. Eligibility of miscellaneous income for deduction under Section 10A/10AA.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Eligibility of Interest Income for Deduction under Section 10A/10AA:

        The assessee, engaged in providing IT services, claimed a deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the deduction on interest income, arguing that it could not be considered as income derived from export-oriented undertakings. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the interest income did not have an immediate source from the eligible undertaking.

        The assessee appealed, contending that the issue was covered in their favor by previous decisions, including those from the Karnataka High Court in *Commissioner of Income Tax vs Motorola India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.* and *Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs American Express India Pvt. Ltd.*, which held that interest income, if treated as business income of the eligible export-oriented unit, is eligible for deduction under Section 10A.

        The Tribunal referred to the Full Bench decision of the Karnataka High Court in *Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd.*, which clarified that interest income earned by a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) from deposits and loans made from surplus funds is to be construed as income derived from the business of the undertaking. The decision emphasized that the profits of the business of the undertaking include all incidental incomes derived from the business, not just the profits from export sales.

        The Tribunal concluded that the interest income earned by the assessee from parking surplus funds in fixed deposits is eligible for deduction under Section 10A, aligning with the Karnataka High Court's interpretation. Thus, the AO was directed to grant the deduction on the interest income of INR 24,306,435.

        2. Eligibility of Miscellaneous Income for Deduction under Section 10A/10AA:

        For the miscellaneous income of INR 1,281,527, the assessee did not provide sufficient details or evidence to demonstrate the nature of the income. The Tribunal noted that the assessee's submissions before the CIT(A) focused solely on the interest income, with no mention or details of the miscellaneous income.

        In the absence of specific information about the nature of the miscellaneous income, the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision to exclude it from the deduction under Section 10A. The assessee's failure to furnish necessary evidence precluded any adjudication on this aspect.

        Conclusion:

        The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. The interest income of INR 24,306,435 was deemed eligible for deduction under Section 10A, while the miscellaneous income of INR 1,281,527 was not. The order was pronounced in the open court on 20/12/2018.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found