1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court rules in favor of Shree Padmanabhaswami Temple Trust on Income Tax exemption</h1> The High Court of Kerala ruled in favor of a charitable trust, Shree Padmanabhaswami Temple Trust, Trivandrum, regarding exemption under section 11 of the ... Charitable Trust, Income Tax Act, Income Tax Rules Issues involved: Interpretation of provisions of section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding exemption for charitable trusts.Judgment Summary:The High Court of Kerala addressed references by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the assessment year 1971-72 concerning a charitable trust, Shree Padmanabhaswami Temple Trust, Trivandrum. The main issue was whether the trust was entitled to exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act. The relevant section allows income to be excluded subject to conditions, including specifying the purpose for accumulation of income. The expression 'prescribed' refers to rules, specifically r. 17, which mandates notice in Form No. 10 to the Income-tax Officer. Form No. 10 outlines the purpose of accumulation, investment options, and reporting requirements. The rule does not specify a time limit for investment, which aligns with the Supreme Court's stance that time elements cannot be included in such rules.The Court agreed with previous decisions that incorporating a time element in Form No. 10 for investment purposes exceeds the provisions of section 11 and r. 17. The Tribunal's decision that investments made after the period mentioned in Form No. 10 should be considered for exemption under section 11(2) was deemed correct. The question of law posed was answered in favor of the assessee, concluding that the income was exempt from taxation. No costs were awarded in this matter.