High Court overturns duty order, remands for review. Supreme Court mandates interest payment on differential duty.

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order confirming duty against the appellant for manufacturing and using goods internally, remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The penalty under Section 11AC was waived due to the appellant's status as a state corporation and lack of malafide intent. The Supreme Court ruled interest is payable on the differential duty, obligating the appellant to pay interest from the due date until payment. The appellant was directed to pay the interest amount as calculated by the adjudicating authority, while the penalty was overturned.

---

---

Issues:
Confirmation of duty against the appellant for manufacture and captive consumption of goods, imposition of penalty, and payment of interest.

Confirmation of Duty and Imposition of Penalty:
The Tribunal's previous order confirmed duty against the appellant, but interest and penalty were set aside due to the appellant being a state government entity and having deposited the duty before the show-cause notice. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration based on a Supreme Court ruling. The appellant believed duty was not payable for goods used internally. The penalty under Section 11AC was contested, citing the Supreme Court's clarification that penalty imposition depends on the circumstances of each case. As the appellant was a state corporation using goods internally without evidence of malafide intent, the penalty was set aside.

Payment of Interest:
The Supreme Court clarified that interest is payable even if duty is paid before a show-cause notice. The appellant, being a state corporation, was obligated to pay interest on the differential duty from the due date until payment. The adjudicating authority will calculate the interest amount for the appellant to deposit. In conclusion, the penalty was set aside, and the appellant was directed to pay the interest amount on the differential duty as per legal obligations.

---